To measure performance using this game, we ran the performance test included in the game, in 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) resolution and image quality configured as “low” and MSAA off. AD870KXBI44JC AD870KXBJCSBX Athlon X4 880K… Just keep in mind that we reached this overclock without changing any voltage configuration. In the tables below, we compare the main features of the CPUs included in our review. Thus, differences below 4% cannot be considered relevant. We converted a 1 GiB, 1920x1080i, 23,738 kbps, .mov video file to a smaller 320×200, H.264, .MP4 file for viewing on a smartphone. The results below are given in seconds, so the lower the better. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. We converted a Full HD, six-minute long .mov video file into an .avi file, using the “HD 1080p” output profile. It comes unlocked so it is easily overclockable and the new improved stock cooler is quiet. In order to measure performance using this game, we walked our way through the first mission, measuring the number of frames per second three times using FRAPS. L1, In theory, the Athlon X4 880K should be a little faster than the A10-7870K, because of the 100 MHz higher clock. Let’s check! In terms of price, the Athlon X4 880K is a direct competitor of the Pentium G4500 from Intel. After all, the Athlon X4 880K is a good buy? AMD has maintained, for some time, two main families of processors: the FX models, with no integrated video and using AM3+ socket, and the A-series processors (A.K.A. Since the A10-7870K and A10-7860K APU reviews, our conclusions have generally been pointing in this direction. Media Espresso is a video conversion program that uses the graphics processing unit of the video engine to speed up the conversion process. Athlon X4 880K is a Middle-Class Processor based on the 28nm, Steamroller Architecture. This item Advance micro device AMD Athlon X4 880K with 125W Thermal Solution 4.0 4 Socket FM2+ AD880KXBJCSBX AMD Athlon X4 860K with 95W Thermal Solution 3.7 GHz Socket FM2+ AD860KXBJASBX AMD Athlon X4 860K Black Edition CPU Quad Core FM2+ 3700Mhz 95W 4MB AD860KXBJABOX Comparing it to the competitor Pentium G4400 (remember that the direct competitor of the Athlon X4 880K is the Pentium G4500, which has 200 MHz more clock than the Pentium G4400), we concluded that, while each core of the Pentium has a higher performance of an Athlon core, the fact the Athlon X4 880K has four cores made a difference on some applications. It is very useful to measure the performance gain obtained by the presence of several processing cores while rendering heavy 3D images. The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the AMD Athlon X4 880K is 23%. AMD Athlon esktop processors deliver excellent multi-threaded performance, now featuring the new AMD Athlon X4 880K with the near-silent 125W AMD Thermal Solution, featuring the AMD Wraith Cooler’s near-silent operation and capable thermal performance, without the illuminated shroud Prosesor desktop Prosesor computer AMD Athlon X4 880K emberikan kinerja multi-threaded yang sangat baik, dengan solusi termal AMD yang baru dan teknologi inti … The problem, of course, is to create a methodology that offers precise results. The Athlon X4 880K's graphics-free design means you'll have to bring a video card to this party. The Athlon X4 880K uses the classic name that, some years ago, was used by the high-end CPUs from AMD, but that has been used recently by the entry-level models like the Athlon 5150, which uses AM1 socket. Yakni, A10-7890K sampai Athlon X4-880K. The X4-880K has four cores so it's equipped to run the newest game titles. The first graph shows the relative performance of the CPU compared to the 10 other common (single) CPUs in terms of PassMark CPU … Particularly, if you are thinking about building a computer based on an AMD A8 or A10 CPU, but want to disable the integrated video and use a mainstream video card, the Athlon X4 880K is a better option. Shown number of Frames Per Second is the maximal possible you can get with this CPU, but you need to build PC without … In this test, the Athlon X4 880K was 4% faster than the A10-7870K, but 18% slower than the Pentium G4400. PCMark 8 is a benchmarking software that uses real-world applications to measure the computer performance. The results are given in seconds, so the less, the best. In our tests, we used a GeForce GTX 950 video card from Gigabyte, since there is no sense in using a low-end or high-end VGA paired with a value/mainstream processor like the Athlon X4 880K. Athlon X4 830: A1 4 3.0 GHz 3.4 GHz 4 x 16 KB + 2 x 96 KB 2× 2 MB N/A DDR3-2133 65 W ? At 4.5 GHz, we don’t get full stability. Fire Strike runs a “heavy” DirectX 11 simulation. [nextpage title=”How We Tested”]During our benchmarking sessions, we used the configuration listed below. One of them is the Athlon X4 880K, which we are testing today. "Upgrade Chance" is a probability of a successful processor … The AMD Athlon X4 880K is the CPU we've been waiting for. It is based on the Frostbite 3 engine, which is DirectX 11. This is made using thousands of PerformanceTest benchmark results and is updated daily.. [nextpage title=”PCMark 8″]. In order to measure the performance using this game, we ran its intro, measuring the framerate with FRAPS three times. Frames per second can vary because of differences in hardware and software enviroments. Here the Athlon X4 880K was 3% faster than the A10-7870K and 28% faster than the Pentium G4400. Rendering is an area where a bigger number of cores helps a lot, because usually this kind of software recognize several processors (Cinebench R15, for example, can use up to 256 processing cores). The Cloud Gate benchmark measures DirectX 10 performance, and the Ice Storm Extreme measures DirectX 9 performance and is targeted to entry-level computers, so we don’t ran it. So, in programs that use one or two processing cores, the Pentium G4400 (and, consequently, the Pentium G4500) is a little faster, but in programs that uses the four cores, the Athlon X4 880K has a higher performance. Dying Light is an open-world horror game launched in January 2015, using the Chrome Engine 6. At this time we know that the processor will run at 4 GHz, or 100 MHz faster than the Athlon X4 870K. We ran GTA V at Full HD, with image quality set as “normal” and MSAA off. AMD Athlon X4 880K Review - Benchmarks: Cinebench R15 We also included the A10-7870K in this comparison, to check if its performance with disabled iGPU is close to the Athlon X4 880K. Cinebench R15 is based on the Cinema 4D software. Dibanding dua produk sebelumnya, X4-880K memiliki core … Between our benchmarking sessions, the only variable device was the CPU being tested, besides the motherboard and memory, which had to be replaced to match the different CPUs. The results below are given in seconds, so the lower the better. In quick tests, we manage to run the Athlon X4 880K with stability (we tested stability with Prime95) up to 4.4 GHz, with 100 MHz base clock and x44 multiplier, with default voltages. 880K Processor with Near Silent Thermal Solution specifications, memory details, graphics information, key features & related products. Price and performance details for the AMD Athlon X4 880K can be found below. So, if you have patience to adjust them, and other advanced options, you may reach higher clocks. High clock speed and core count, especially for under $100. We used it to compress the DVD of “The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring” DVD to 4.7 GiB. The results below are given in seconds, so the lower the better. May it be a good choice? The Athlon X4 880K had a score similar to the A10-7870K, and 10% lower than the Pentium G4400, on the Home benchmark. Battlefield 4 is the latest installment in the Battlefield franchise, released in 2013. AMD Athlon X4 880K. On Battlefield 4, the Athlon X4 880K obtained the same performance of the A10-7870K, and was 15% faster than the Pentium G4400. On the Cloud Gate benchmark, the Athlon X4 880K was on tie with the A10-7870K, and it was 21% faster than the Pentium G4400. Do not settle for anything less than AMD's Athlon™ X4 860K quad-core desktop processor designed on FM2+ socket. But is it a good buy? Here the Athlon X4 880K had the same performance of the A10-7870K and 16% slower than the Pentium G4400. We tested the new Athlon X4 880K processor from AMD, which is an A10 CPU with the integrated video disabled. For Photoshop CC, we used a script named “Retouch Artist Speed Test,” which applies a series of filters to a standard image and gives the time Photoshop takes to run all of them. The AMD Athlon x4 880K is a CPU, not an APU, so you must use a discrete graphics card. On DivX encoding, the Athlon X4 880K obtained the same performance of the A10-7870K, while being 11% slower than the Pentium G4400. The Athlon X4 880K has an unlocked clock multiplier, which means it is possible to overclock it just by adjusting its clock multiplier. Beli Amd Athlon X4 880k Online berkualitas dengan harga murah terbaru 2020 di Tokopedia! Grand Theft Auto V, or simply GTA V, is an open-world action game released for PCs in April of 2015, using the RAGE engine. Sky Diver also measures DirectX 11 performance, and is aimed on average computers. We ran this game at Full HD, setting overall image quality at “low.”. DVDShrink is an old but still very useful program to “shrink” video DVDs that have more than 4.7 GiB of data to fit single-layer DVD media. The results below are expressed in frames per second (fps). Memory (DDR3): 8 GiB DDR3-2133, two G.Skill Ripjaws F3-17000CL9Q-16GBZH 4 GiB memory modules configured at 2,133 MHz, Memory (DDR4): 8 GiB DDR4-2400 two G.Skill Ripjaws 4 F4-2400C15Q-16GRR 4 GiB memory modules configured at 2133 MHz. On GTA V, the Athlon X4 880K had the same performance of the A10-7870K, and was 73% faster than the Pentium G4400. Weaknesses The results below are expressed in frames per second. Learn More! Recently, however, AMD announced new processors that use the FM2+ socket with no integrated GPU, using the brand Athlon. L2, 256 KB, Be respectful, keep it civil and stay on topic. We delete comments that violate our policy, which we encourage you to read. On Fire Strike, all the three processors obtained similar performances. We ran the CPU benchmark, which renders a complex image using all the processing cores (real and virtual) to speed up the process. Sebelumnya, sudah ada X4-860K, dan X4-845. But paired with even a modest one, on an affordable FM2+ motherboard (these currently start as low as $40), the $95-MSRP Athlon X4 880K could be the basis of a quite capable and affordable PC for gaming at 1080p or … Continuing to build upon their Athlon X4 lineup, AMD released the Athlon X4 880K CPU on March 1st, 2016, positioning it with a 4.0 GHz base operating frequency and a turbo mode frequency of 4.2 GHz. In this test, the Athlon X4 880K was 4% faster than the A10-7870K and 73% faster than the Pentium G4400. Figure 2: bottom side of the Athlon X4 880K. In this game, all of the three CPUs had the same performance. Bila dikombinasikan Prosesor computer AMD Athlon X4 880K dengan AMD Radeon Graphics, kinerja dan nilai teknologi AMD yang ekstrem ada di ujung jari Anda. [nextpage title=”Overclocking”]. Let’s see the results. Rafael Otto Coelho is a physicist, a PhD student, and is a college professor in Brazil. In order to measure the performance on this game, we ran the performance test of the game, measuring the framerate with FRAPS. Here, the Athlon X4 845 outpaced the pricier Athlon X4 880K (and its older Steamroller cores) in impressive fashion. Check Out How Good Will AMD Athlon X4 880K Run Games . Let’s compare the main specs of the reviewed CPUs in the next page. CPU AMD Athlon X4 880K, A10-7850K, A8-7650K, FX-8370, FX-8350 Cooling AMD WRAITH/near silent Thermal solution Motherboard GIGABYTE G1-A88X Sniper Memory AMD RADEON 2x 8GB DDR3 2400MHz Graphics GIGABYTE AMD R9 280X Storage HYPERX 3K 240GB PSU NZXT HALE 650W Pembayaran mudah, pengiriman cepat & bisa cicil 0%. We used the DivX converter, a tool included in the DivX package, in order to measure the encoding performance using this codec. Check out AMD Athlon X4 880K with 125W Thermal Solution 4.0 4 Socket FM2+ AD880KXBJCSBX reviews, ratings, features, specifications and browse more AMD products online at … Our feel from the beginning was that the Athlon X4 880K was actually an A10-7870K with the integrated video disabled and 100 MHz more clock. In this game, the Athlon X4 880K obtained the same performance of the A10-7870K, but was 10% slower than the Pentium G4400. The new Athlon X4 880K is the most high-end of the new CPUs with “Athlon” brand. AMD Athlon X4-880K Quad Core hadir dengan multiplier yang sudah di-unlock sehingga memungkinkan pengguna lebih leluasa dalam melakukan overclock demi peningkatan performa. Let's check! It is also based on the “Godavari” core. [nextpage title=”Photoshop CC and Cinebench R15″]. Last one Free shipping. The fastest Athlon yet hits the FM2+ platform; by doing without the integrated GPU as found in the A-Series APUs, AMD provide better value for gamers. 4 MB. We adopted a 4% error margin. Let’s se if it is true in real-world tests. As the Athlon X4 880K has no integrated video, we will also disable the integrated GPU on the Pentium G4400. In order to measure the performance using this game, we ran the benchmark included on it, using Full HD resolution and graphics quality “low”. In other words, products with a performance difference below 4% should be considered as having similar performance. Therefore, the Athlon X4 880K is aimed on value/mainstream workstations or gamer computers with a “real” video card. Mad Max is an open-world action game launched in September of 2015, using the Avalanche engine. Figure 1 reveals the Athlon X4 880K we used on our tests. Harap di ingat, overclocking berpotensi merusak hardware sehingga harus dilakukan secara hati-hati dan disarankan menggunakan … But the A10-7890K did better, thanks to its higher 4.1GHz base clock speed. It has almost the same characteristics of the A10-7870K (which we tested recently), but its clock is a little higher (4.2 GHz maximum clock vs. 4.1 GHz of the A10-7870K) and, obviously, without the iGPU that is a trademark of the A10. The Athlon X4 880K was released less than a year after the Athlon X4 870K, and so they are likely to have similar levels of support, and similarly optimized performance when running the latest games. Be respectful, keep it civil and stay on topic. Apa perbedaan antara AMD FX-6300 dan AMD Athlon X4 880K? Here are some examples of searches: 870K, AD870KXBI44JC, AMD Athlon X4 3.9GHz, Godavari Socket FM2+ 95 Watt, Steamroller 4 cores 4 threads, 0.028 micron 4 MB noGPU Historical price chart The chart below shows official prices of AMD Athlon X4 860K, 870K, 880K and 845 processors: Rise of the Tomb Rider is an adventure/action game launched in January of 2016, based on Foundation engine. Keep in mind that, in our tests, the integrated video was disabled and a mainstream video card (GeForce GTX 950) was used. CPU (ซีพียู) AMD FM2+ X4-880K ATHLON QUIET COOLER . Our tests were consistent with that: the Athlon X4 880K performed barely better than the A10-7870K, but the difference was so small that we can consider both the CPUs were similar in performance. On Creative benchmark, the Athlon X4 880K reached a score similar to the A10-7870K, and 10% lower than the Pentium G4400. In this game, the performance of the Athlon X4 880K was similar to the A10-7870K, and 29% higher than the Pentium G4400. In this game, the Athlon X4 880K was on tie with an A10-7870K, but was 14% slower than the Pentium G4400. We tested the performance at this game with quality options at the minimum and Full HD resolution, measuring three times the frame rate using FRAPS. The chip will have 95 Watt TDP. Keep in mind that we used a GeForce GTX 950 VGA in this test on all CPUs. Below you can see the memory configuration for each CPU. This is a relatively narrow range which indicates that the AMD Athlon X4 880K performs reasonably consistently under varying real world conditions. Untuk sementara ini, Athlon X4-880K bisa dikatakn yang tertinggi dari lineup X4 Kaveri. Do memory timings affect integrated video performance? Discussion threads can be closed at any time at our discretion. CORES : 4
THREADS : 4 . The DivX codec is capable of recognizing and using all available cores and the SSE4 instruction set. Dirt Rally is an off-road racing game released in April 2015, using Ego engine. Buy AMD Athlon X4 880K with 125W Thermal Solution 4.0 4 Socket FM2+ AD880KXBJCSBX online at low price in India on Amazon.in. AMD Athlon X4 880K CPU LidWhen looking to build a budget system, every penny counts. The results below are expressed in fps and they are the mean between the three collected results. AMD Athlon II X4 880K / 4 GHz processor | AD880KXBJCSBX. The result is given as a score. Namun, kali ini saya hanya mencoba Athlon X4-880K yang memiliki 4 compute units. AD830XYBI44JA Athlon X4 840: 3.1 GHz: 3.8 GHz: Aug, 2014 AD840XYBI44JA Athlon X4 860K: 3.7 GHz: 4.0 GHz: 95 W: AD860KXBI44JA AD860KXBJABOX AD860KWOHLBOX AD860KXBJASBX Athlon X4 870K: 3.9 GHz: 4.1 GHz? On the Work benchmark, the Athlon X4 880K also reached a score similar to the A10-7870K, but 8% below the Pentium G4400. The Athlon X4 880K retails for $95 and it is a quite capable and affordable chip for gaming at 1080p. Great gifts you can still get in time for Christmas, 6 streaming services you can give as gifts (including Disney Plus), Get it there by Christmas: 2020 holiday shipping deadlines, Discuss: AMD Athlon II X4 880K / 4 GHz processor. Have a spectacular experience with AMD CPUs! Discuss: AMD Athlon II X4 880K / 4 GHz processor Sign in to comment. Based on 11,568 user benchmarks for the AMD Athlon X4 845 and the Athlon X4 880K, we rank them both on effective speed and value for … Yes, if you are building a computer for gaming or working, with a dedicated video card, and need to focus on cost/benefit ratio, it is a good processor. Sub description. We ran three tests: Home, which includes web browsing, writing, light gaming, photo editing, and video chat tests; Creative, that includes web surfing, video editing, group video chat, video conversion, and gaming; and Work, which runs tasks such as writing documents, web browsing, spreadsheets, editing, and video chatting. © 2020 CNET, A RED VENTURES COMPANY. The main difference between the G4500 and the G4400 is the integrated GPU, besides the 3.3 GHz clock of the G4400, while the G4500 has a clock of 3.5 GHz. On the Sky Diver benchmark, the Athlon X4 880K performed similarly to the A10-7870K, and it was 9% faster than the Pentium G4400. Details of this processor, such as clock speed and TDP, were spotted in Biostar CPU support lists. item 7 AMD Athlon X4 880K 4.0 GHz Quad-Core CPU Processor AD880KXBI44JC Socket FM2+ 7 - AMD Athlon X4 880K 4.0 GHz Quad-Core CPU Processor AD880KXBI44JC Socket FM2+ $99.98. The results below are expressed in frames per second (fps) and they are the mean between the three collected results. In our test, however, we used the Pentium G4400, which is the closest match we had at our lab. Athlon X4 880K is an upcoming quad-core processor for socket FM2+ platform. Temukan mana yang lebih baik dan performa mereka secara keseluruhan dalam peringkat CPU. We ran the game at Full HD, with image quality set as “normal”. The best way to measure the performance of a CPU is by using real programs. It is actually an A10 processor with the integrated GPU (iGPU) disabled. 3DMark is a program with a set of several 3D benchmarks. On the games we tested, it was also clear: on one game the CPUs were on a tie, on two titles the Pentium G4400 was a little faster, but on three games the Athlon X4 880K performed better. Results can vary in comparison to reality. APUs,) with integrated video and using FM2+ socket.