AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U vs Intel Core i5-9600K: 21. Why not run the standard TR laptop battery life Browserbench? The Ryzen 5 2500U’s battery life in the laptops TR and Hot Hardware checked is pretty bad. Even the i7-7700HQ delivered crackling and popping with no voices of polyphony in play. Euler3D tackles the difficult problem of simulating fluid dynamics. I’m looking forward for the 15″ Ryzen Acer review. As always, AMD is behind releasing products from where we want them to be, but they’d need more resources (money, humans, time) to go faster. Can you please say what the heat output was? *looks at frametime numbers for Witcher 3 and DOOM*. Although the Ryzen 5 2500U is a little behind the i5-8250U’s file-compression performance with 7-zip, it’s just about as fast in the more common decompression task. Expect full fledged chip in 35-45W TPD to be MX150 level. As you can see in the table, clock speeds range from 2.0 or 2.2 GHz base, up to 3.6 or 3.8 GHz boost, right in the ballpark of Kaby Lake Refresh. Whatever. AMD was insistent I test the Ryzen 5 processors with B350 motherboards both because the firm has worked closely with motherboard BIOS designers to … AMD Ryzen 5 2500U ⭐avis. I guess I was hyped over the initial rumours that Raven Ridge GPU would have 704 shaders. Hopefully you find some decent tests to run. Without Enmotus FuzeDrive for Ryzen, the system took 28.611 seconds to complete a boot to Windows via … This is made using thousands of PerformanceTest benchmark results and is updated daily.. The Fastest in the Game 1 Whether gaming or creating, AMD Ryzen™ processors offer ultimate performance. Media encoding with X264 shows another mixed bag of results for AMD. The AMD chip isn’t that far behind a Kaby Lake Core i5 without Speed Shift enabled, but it’s no match for the Core i5-8250U in these results. Discussion. Cinebench seems to like AMD CPUs, and AMD certainly likes talking up Cinebench in its CPU marketing, so let’s see whether this win carries over to other CPU rendering tasks. Our resident code monkey, Bruno Ferreira, helped us put together this code-compiling test. I believe that you’re accusing me of testing an Acer Swift 3 with an i5-8250U at 25W TDP against our HP Envy x360 with Ryzen inside running at 15W. Yeah, I think the real comparison would be the 2700u @ 25w vs the Intel+MX150. I have personally preferred NV GPUs over the past decade or so, but I don’t think AMD+Intel Kaby Lake G will disappoint. All systems were configured to use Windows’ default “Balanced” power plan over the course of our testing. acer nitro 5 AN515 42 ryzen 2500u cpu ( 2ghz base clock and 3.6ghz boost clock) with rx560x graphics the problem is while on battery cpu doesnt go beyond 1.6ghz ( even under high performance settings) but when i plug in adapter it can go upto 3.6 ghz or 3ghz on single and multi core, i checked on hardware monitor while running cinnebench r15 2 years ago. The only difference would be the CPU and chipset. The essentials benchmark tests web-browsing performance, video conferencing, and a range of app start-up times. Even if they get the 15W Cannonlake parts out, they plan to release GT3e Coffeelake parts. As dirty as this makes me feel, I agree with chuckula. Vsync was disabled using the graphics-driver control panel, where possible. Its simple,get hold of the Intel version of Envy X360 using the same chassis and a Core i5 8250U: Thank you for your hard work. The number of jobs dispatched by the Qtbench script is configurable, and we set the number of threads to match the hardware thread count for each CPU. AMD Ryzen™ 5000 Series processors power the next generation of demanding games, providing one of a kind immersive experiences and dominate any multithreaded task like 3D and video rendering 3, and software compiling. It wouldn’t be Apple to Apples since the laptops used different chassis and other parts. Up to 4.5GHz. TEST YOUR CPU. Odd, it didn’t link my comment properly so here’s the text. The Vega 8 IGP fares the worst of this bunch by that metric. (That is assuming though the mobile ryzen actually competes efficiency-wise in low-load / idle scenarios, that is it must have similar runtime – aside from performance that’s the most important metric for a mobile cpu, and some would probably put that as more significant than performance even.). Thanks Jeff, been waiting to see this review. Cinebench R20 (Single-Core) Ryzen 5 3550H +2%. Any touchscreen + stylus will eat up battery life as well. These chips can easily handle all daily home and office tasks. There’s not a Vega GPU that small (yet). The Ryzen 7 2700U is even faster, with more compute cores at a higher clock, but I’ll have to hunt down a product with Ryzen 7 inside to get a better idea how it performs. That said, we’re already kind of in that world with cooling so it’s just a fact of life now. If anything I’m pretty disappointed in the IGP performance of the Ryzen parts considering the flak that Intel gets over its rather weak integrated graphics. I’m certainly curious to see what the more-capable Vega 10 IGP in the Ryzen 7 2700U is capable of now, and the prospect of a higher-TDP desktop chip with this CPU-and-graphics combo inside is especially exciting. Hopefully we’ll be able to find out with time. Our $750 test system pairs a Ryzen 5 2500U APU with a one-terabyte, 7200-RPM mechanical hard drive, 8 GB of dual-channel DDR4-2400 RAM, a 15.6″, 1920×1080 screen with a convertible hinge. (Part of the deficiency on the Intel part is because they are screwing up on the process, and thus product timeline but that’s the real world). $760 for this same system with a 256GB SSD upgrade is an immeasurably better starting position for the Envy x360 and its Ryzen 5 2500U. Based on 220,891 user benchmarks for the AMD Ryzen 5 2500U and the Intel Core i5-8250U, we rank them both on effective speed and value for money against the best 1,276 CPUs. Overall, AMD finally has the competitive CPU cores it’s so desperately needed to go with the powerful graphics processors in its APUs, but for the middle of the bell curve, single-threaded performance and snappiness still matters most. A more “barebones” laptop (maybe an Acer or Asus) with just a screen + keyboard + touchpad (no stylus, no touchscreen, etc. The strongest way for AMD’s partners to make that case will be with price tags. Graphics . The mobile Zen CPU part seems to be performing better than expected. . "Run as Administrator": What Does It Mean? Also, I little surprised how big the gap between UHD 620 and HD620 because both have same architecture and 24 EU. I’m loath to comment on other sites’ testing methods or results, because we all test differently and in different environments. Some additional notes regarding our testing methods: Our testing methods are generally publicly available and reproducible. (IE: Stylus support and Numpad). For the price of this Envy you can pick up a 15″ Dell with a GTX 1050 and quad-core CPU. Surely any advances in a dedicated GPU architecture would also reflect in integrated GPUs, like we’re seeing in Vega mobile in this very article, like Pascal, etc. the HP Envy x360 is powered by a Ryzen 5 2500U, 16GB DDR4-2400 and a 256GB PCIe SSD. UserBenchmark USA-User . His machine is in no way configured with single channel memory. 8. To see how it performs on these chips, we’re switching things up from some of our past reviews. UserBenchmark USA-User . Given that the Ryzen 7 mobile should have peak GPU performance of about 45% over this Ryzen 5. sometimes power profiles/tweaks will be based on if it is plugged in or not. Copyright Tech Report. We used the latest version of the Reaper DAW for Windows as the platform for our tests. Considering how precious that kind of performance is for a responsive user experience, AMD and its partners will have to make the case that the all-around competence of the Ryzen Mobile APU is worth trading away a bit of the single-threaded oomph of Kaby Lake Refresh for a broad swath of users. TEST YOUR CPU. A huge bug, which is understandable given the platforms first gen. Not good or acceptable, but understandable. If Ryzen APUs had gone up against the Core i5-7200U and i7-7500U it wouldn’t be much of a contest. A laptop with a 20″ display that is still relatively lightweight (similar to thinner 17″ designs) due to not needing a battery or space for it. A more neutral compiler might make for a better benchmark, but it may also not be representative of real-world results with real-world software, and we are generally concerned with real-world performance. The Radeon is thoroughly outclassed at these settings, so gamers will want to stick with lower settings, less eye candy, or both approaches to keep frame rates playable and frame delivery smooth-ish. You’d expect as much, given the furriness of the frame-time graph for the Nvidia chip. I’d like a continued cinebench run where we check power usage at 1 minute, 5 minutes, and 15 minutes. The Envy x360 falls short in enough places that I’d have a hard time justifying its price tag. I wanted to test Tomb Raider‘s 2013 reboot on the Ryzen 5 2500U to get a sense of how it compared to the Intel IGPs in that title, but the Radeon’s drivers forced vsync on with Tomb Raider regardless of the in-game settings I chose. The really interesting thing to discover at this point is what this silicon could do with the power and cooling of a desktop form-factor. 2019 Premium Lenovo Ideapad 330 Laptop 1... 2019 Premium Lenovo Ideapad 330 Laptop 15.6" Full HD (1920 x 1080), AMD Quad-Core Ryzen 5 2500U up to 3.6GHz(Beat i7-7500U), 8GB DDR4, 256GB SSD, WiFi 802.11ac, Bluetooth, HDMI, Windows 10, Gray AMD might offer unlocked versions, or it might not. If one of AMD’s partners can get a Ryzen 5 2500U into a thin-and-light laptop with a similar SSD and RAM configuration for around $600, we’ll really be talking. The Acer Swift 3 with the Ryzen 5 2500U/Ryzen 7 2700U, for what it’s worth, is cTDP-upped to 25 watts. CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM USB FPS EFPS YouTube *NEW* COMPARE BUILD TEST ABOUT × COMPARE. The improved Precision Boost intelligence in Raven Ridge chips also affords the Ryzen 5 2500U much more granular control over its per-core Turbo speeds versus its desktop cousins, too, meaning that the chip could potentially run more of its cores at higher clocks for longer as it distributes its thermal budget over given workloads. PCMark 10 tests some things that we don’t have tools for, like video conferencing, app launch times, and general productivity performance with common office apps like LibreOffice Writer and Calc. Därför är det extra intressant att vi har en AMD-driven modell från HP på vårt kontor. These “time spent beyond X” graphs are meant to show “badness,” those instances where animation may be less than fluid—or at least less than perfect. (‘ω’), A portable computer, basically a DTR, but in a slimmer form factor due to not having to design for battery power, or dual power sources (battery/AC). As long as he doesn’t use small fft’s prime, lol…. Specially if you travel a lot. They even updated the article with new drivers from HP and noted that the CPU usage during video playback was quite low so it’s not like there was a software bug that was preventing the GPU from handling video offload duties. The correct comparison, architecture-wise, is between iGPU only. The test runs with a single thread and then with as many threads as possible. Jeff kampMAN please for the love of tech do some battery life testing. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. Even with that 99th-percentile result, it’s still kind of a wonder that the Vega 8 IGP can turn in a playable experience with The Witcher 3 when the blue team’s IGPs are running the game so slowly that Geralt literally hangs in midair while he runs. What’s not to like? Thanks for the great work, guys! The two APUs in the Ryzen line-up for now are the Ryzen 5 2500U and the Ryzen 7 2700U. test.result. “To make benchmarking the Envy bearable (and to put it on a level playing field with the Acer Swift 3s I just reviewed), I stuck a Samsung 960 EVO 500GB NVMe from our stockpile inside.”. For all its spikiness, the MX150 still turns in less time past 33.3 ms than the Vega 8 does by a small margin, although we’d really hope to see no time at all in the green team’s bucket given the card’s high average frame rate. AMD has to work around the mem latency issues that hurt performance on some places (maybe this doesnt help with the spiky frame timing on some games). Example: if you push a pair of GPUs hard enough to get it down to 1 and 2 fps respectively, that absolutely doesn’t mean on a lighter workload they are going to run 30 and 60! Even with all those tweaks it’s still not that good. By popular demand, I’ve added full frame-time data for [i. They are almost *always* changed depending on whether the laptop is plugged in. While the workstations need some very bulky and energy consuming batteries or power supplies. The CPU or GPU alone would be impacted by the limitations imposed by single-channel memory, but both at once (such as in a gaming scenario), I can’t see this having anything but a measurably negative impact on performance. Our $750 test system pairs a Ryzen 5 2500U APU with a one-terabyte, 7200-RPM mechanical hard drive, 8 GB of dual-channel DDR4-2400 RAM, a 15.6″, 1920×1080 screen with a convertible hinge. So I think Techreport made a wise move with regards to battery-life testing. CPU; GPU; SSD; HDD; RAM; USB; CPU RANKINGS. My disappointment is that AMD didn’t start with a 35 Watt APU. The point of integrating a GPU is to maximize performance at very power constrained form factors.